A creditwrench student from Tulsa, Oklahoma tells how he won against a
prominent Tulsa lawfirm in Tulsa County Court. There were two
contributing factors to his win. He had been served with a summons and
complaint but was called out of town for an extended period of time and
could not reply to the plaintiff’s discovery demands. When he returned
he found that the plaintiff had filed for judgment based on his failure
to respond to their discovery demands. He filed a response requesting
more time to answer explaining why he had failed to respond, mailed his
response to the plaintiff and at the same time sent his own demand for
admissions. When he went to court the plaintiff dismissed the case.
This was probably due to the fact that the plaintiff could not meet the
defendant’s demand for admissions of fact.Listen to the words of the
Tulsa, Oklahoma man as he describes what happened on the Friday night
conference call for December 5th, 2008